hoorayforgifs

Random gifs -- made some, not all.

knightinshiningsemtex:

Have a Cat-shamed Khoshekh, being an asshole like any other cat.

I imagine that if you were able to take pictures of Khoshekh, This is what Cecil would be doing.

I may do a coloured version later on but I just really needed to post this.

(If you can’t read it, just click to get the captions)

— 1 week ago with 1186 notes
#cat shaming  #khoshekh  #wtnv 

sexybaldwin:

Actual footage of Cecil and Khoshekh saving people from the Company Picnic:

image

— 1 week ago with 306 notes
#khoshekh  #wtnv  #ceclios 
http://l-m-pandora.tumblr.com/post/90539313993/old-oak-doors-part-a-cecil-d-dana-dana-how-do →

l-m-pandora:

OLD OAK DOORS PART A

Cecil: D-Dana-Dana, how do we get Carlos home?! I…I would like…Carlos to come home…

Carlos: I’ll be able to, very soon.

image

OLD OAK DOORS PART B

Carlos: …But then, as the last of the masked army members came through the door, it slammed shut and vanished. And I…

— 1 week ago with 535 notes

slytherinsaa:

 tamika flynn’s book club to strexcorp:

image

— 1 week ago with 701 notes

cascrieff:

KEVIN RESISTED MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE IN DESERT BLUFFS

THE REAL KEVIN IS PROBABLY STILL IN THERE

SCREAMING

MAYBE THAT’S WHY SOMETIMES HE SEEMS SO HATEFUL AND CAUSTICALLY SARCASTIC TOWARDS LAUREN

HE WAS PROBABLY JUST LIKE CECIL UNTIL STREX CAME

I DID NOT EXPECT TO WANT TO CRY OVER KEVIN

My headcannon is that could be why Kevin thinks his eyes match Cecils, but Cecil doesn’t agree. Kevin and Cecil had the same eyes, before Kevin was forced to look into the Smiling God. That’s what caused his horrible eyes. Kevin doesn’t like to think about that part.

— 1 week ago with 839 notes
#wtnv  #wtnv headcanons  #smiling god  #strex  #strexcorp  #night vale 

thisfriendlydesertcommunity:

remember that no matter what you write, and no matter how bad you think it is, tamika flynn would love it

And even better, it wont even be the worst book she ever read. That honor goes to the manual. Hahaha. 

— 1 week ago with 176 notes
#tamika flynn  #tamika  #writing  #wtnv  #strex  #strexcorp 
"

Okay, okay, I’m going to tell you what Hermione sees in Ron.

A trio is a balancing act, right? They’re equalizers of each other. Harry’s like the action, Hermione’s the brains, Ron’s the heart. Hermione has been assassinated in these movies, and I mean that genuinely—by giving her every single positive character trait that Ron has, they have assassinated her character in the movies. She’s been harmed by being made to be less human, because everything good Ron has, she’s been given.

So, for instance: “If you want to kill Harry, you’re going to have to kill me too”—RON, leg is broken, he’s in pain, gets up and stands in front of Harry and says this. Who gets that line in the movie? Hermione.

“Fear of a name increases the fear of the thing itself.” Hermione doesn’t say Voldemort’s name until well into the books—that’s Dumbledore’s line. When does Hermione say it in the movies? Beginning of Movie 2.

When the Devil’s Snare is curling itself around everybody, Hermione panics, and Ron is the one who keeps his head and says “Are you a witch or not?” In the movie, everybody else panics and Hermione keeps her head and does the biggest, brightest flare of sunlight spell there ever was.

So, Hermione—all her flaws were shaved away in the films. And that sounds like you’re making a kick-ass, amazing character, and what you’re doing is dehumanizing her. And it pisses me off. It really does.

In the books, they balance each other out, because where Hermione gets frazzled and maybe her rationality overtakes some of her instinct, Ron has that to back it up; Ron has a kind of emotional grounding that can keep Hermione’s hyper-rationalness in check. Sometimes Hermione’s super-logical nature grates Harry and bothers him, and isn’t the thing he needs even if it’s the right thing, like when she says “You have a saving people thing.” That is the thing that Harry needed to hear, she’s a hundred percent right, but the way she does it is wrong. That’s the classic “she’s super logical, she’s super brilliant, but she doesn’t know how to handle people emotionally,” at least Harry.

So in the books they are this balanced group, and in the movies, in the movies—hell, not even Harry is good enough for Hermione in the movies. No one’s good enough for Hermione in the movies—God isn’t good enough for Hermione in the movies! Hermione is everybody’s everything in the movies.

Harry’s idea to jump on the dragon in the books, who gets it in the movies? Hermione, who hates to fly. Hermione, who overcomes her withering fear of flying to take over Harry’s big idea to get out of the—like, why does Hermione get all these moments?

[John: Because we need to market the movie to girls.]

I think girls like the books, period. And like the Hermione in the books, and like the Hermione in the books just fine before Hollywood made her idealized and perfect. And if they would have trusted that, they would have been just fine.

Would the movies have been bad if she was as awesome as she was in the books, and as human as she was in the books? Would the movies get worse?

She IS a strong girl character. This is the thing that pisses me off. They are equating “strong” with superhuman. To me, the Hermione in the book is twelve times stronger than the completely unreachable ideal of Hermione in the movies. Give me the Hermione in the book who’s human and has flaws any single day of the week.

Here’s a classic example: When Snape in the first book yells at Hermione for being an insufferable know-it-all, do you want to know what Ron says in the book? “Well, you’re asking the questions, and she has to answer. Why ask if you don’t want to be told?” What does he say in the movie? “He’s got a point, you know.” Ron? Would never do that. Would NEVER do that, even before he liked Hermione. Ron would never do that.

"
Melissa Anelli THROWS IT DOWN about the way Ron and Hermione have been adapted in the movies on the latest episode of PotterCast. Listen here. This glorious rant starts at about 49:00. (via karakamos)

(via ginnabean)

— 5 months ago with 92305 notes
fandomsandfeminism:

idkwhatimdoingonherelol:

fandomsandfeminism:

equalityoverfeminism:

Protip: Don’t be this retarded. If you consent to sex in a drunken stupor and regret it and declare “rape” afterwards, the whole ordeal is your fault and your fault alone because:
You were stupid enough to consume too much alcohol.
You were stupid enough to consume too much alcohol around people you shouldn’t be trusting.
You fucking consented and the man believed he was permitted to have sex with you.
Quit victimizing yourselves (in such idiotic ways too) — you only perpetuate the “misogynist” stereotype that all feminists have a collective IQ in the two-digit range. 

I need Feminism because when a woman points out that a “yes” given when you are unable to properly consent is NOT in fact proper consent, bigots call her ableist slurs.

You’re completely correct. However, the fact is that that woman did intentionally render herself "unable to properly consent". This unequivocal fact makes it entirely justified to blame the victim in these instances.  

And you can go fuck yourself.
No. No, no no. It is never the victims fault. No one forces a rapist to take advantage of someone who is clearly too intoxicated to consent. You don’t get to give a rapist a free pass just because beer was involved. 
Fucking disgusting rape apologists. 

I think my “favorite” part is the fact that really, if a girl is MAKING HERSELF UNAVAILABLE TO ACTUALLY SAY YES, if she is intentionally rendering herself unable to properly consent, that is literally her saying no. How does that fact not register? If you fill up your day planner to where you literally cannot say yes, to a date or something… Does that mean that somehow you’re really saying yes, even though you literally cant?

What the fuck is wrong with these men?

fandomsandfeminism:

idkwhatimdoingonherelol:

fandomsandfeminism:

equalityoverfeminism:

Protip: Don’t be this retarded. If you consent to sex in a drunken stupor and regret it and declare “rape” afterwards, the whole ordeal is your fault and your fault alone because:

  1. You were stupid enough to consume too much alcohol.
  2. You were stupid enough to consume too much alcohol around people you shouldn’t be trusting.
  3. You fucking consented and the man believed he was permitted to have sex with you.

Quit victimizing yourselves (in such idiotic ways too) — you only perpetuate the “misogynist” stereotype that all feminists have a collective IQ in the two-digit range. 

I need Feminism because when a woman points out that a “yes” given when you are unable to properly consent is NOT in fact proper consent, bigots call her ableist slurs.

You’re completely correct. However, the fact is that that woman did intentionally render herself "unable to properly consent". This unequivocal fact makes it entirely justified to blame the victim in these instances.  

And you can go fuck yourself.

No. No, no no. It is never the victims fault. No one forces a rapist to take advantage of someone who is clearly too intoxicated to consent. You don’t get to give a rapist a free pass just because beer was involved. 

Fucking disgusting rape apologists. 

I think my “favorite” part is the fact that really, if a girl is MAKING HERSELF UNAVAILABLE TO ACTUALLY SAY YES, if she is intentionally rendering herself unable to properly consent, that is literally her saying no. How does that fact not register? If you fill up your day planner to where you literally cannot say yes, to a date or something… Does that mean that somehow you’re really saying yes, even though you literally cant?

What the fuck is wrong with these men?

— 8 months ago with 1156 notes
Do you think mayyybe wizards come back as imaginary friends? Did Fred fake his death?! Was he brought back?? THIS IS STILL TOO SOON FOR ME. 
I totally just made that correlation in my head at work today.

Do you think mayyybe wizards come back as imaginary friends? Did Fred fake his death?! Was he brought back?? THIS IS STILL TOO SOON FOR ME. 

I totally just made that correlation in my head at work today.

— 9 months ago with 8 notes
#dropdeadfred  #drop dead fred  #harry potter  #fred weasley  #muggles  #hogwarts  #too soon  #rip fred weasley  #movie correlations